Debt swap

Kenya’s proposed debt-for-food swap represents a strategic convergence of fiscal reform and humanitarian need, offering a potentially transformative pathway to ease macroeconomic pressure while addressing food insecurity. However, the promise of such innovative instruments cannot be realized without robust transparency and public accountability. The government’s vague references to “advanced stages” of negotiation, coupled with the absence of clear details on the structure, costs, and stakeholders involved, undermine public trust and violate the principles of good governance. As Afronomicslaw’s case before the EACJ highlights, transparency is not a procedural formality, it is a democratic imperative. Without full disclosure and meaningful public participation, the true benefits of debt swaps cannot be assessed, and the risk of mismanagement or corruption remains high. Sustainable financing must be matched by sustainable governance where citizens are informed, engaged, and empowered to shape the decisions that affect their future.

In summary, as stakeholders gather and discuss at the COP28 summit in Dubai, it is important for them to bear in mind that while debt-for-climate or ecological debt for fiscal debt swaps offers a promising approach to addressing debt and climate challenges simultaneously, they need to be implemented with careful attention to transparency, accountability, and integrity. Otherwise, it could become just another pathway to facilitate IFFs in Africa, which have the potential to undermine the fiscal benefits that should ordinarily result from these swaps.