Non-Discrimination

The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement signifies a transformative milestone in Africa’s quest for regional economic integration. In The African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement: Legal and Policy Frameworks, Collins C. Ajibo delivers a rigorous and interdisciplinary analysis of the AfCFTA, deftly integrating legal, economic, and institutional perspectives. The book illuminates the complexities of this ambitious initiative, balancing an exploration of its challenges with an articulation of its immense potential. Ajibo systematically unpacks the theoretical foundations, operational challenges, and transformative possibilities inherent in the AfCFTA, positioning it as a vital mechanism for sustainable development in Africa.

Now that the commencement of AFCTA has been postponed in view of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need for a clear conceptualisation of flexibility in relation to the commitments and obligations created in African RTAs including the AFCTA. There is also a need to identify how some narratives that are subsumed in the flexibility paradigm may end up doing more harm than good to informal trade engagements in the continent.

Noting the different levels of economic development amongst AfCFTA State Parties, this post intends to shed light on implementation of Annex 4 to the benefit of all. This is in part due to the fact that the TFA steers away from the ‘one size fits all’ approach and instead introduces new, unique and innovative features to facilitate Members’ integration into the global value networks. Furthermore, I contend that the features discussed could serve as a model to further elaborate on Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) as a guiding principle within the context of trade facilitation measures.