Afronomicslaw Sovereign Debt Quarterly Brief, No. 2 of 2025: The Impact of IMF - Recommended Consumption Tax Policy on Africa's Rising Public Debt Levels

This report critically explores the IMF’s consumption tax policies and their adverse effects on borrower nations, particularly in Africa and the Global South. It examines how the IMF’s emphasis on consumption taxes like VAT, when used as a tool for revenue mobilization, often leads to regressive outcomes by exacerbating inequality, increasing poverty, and contributing to unsustainable public debt. Through an analysis of the global debt architecture evolution and a review of IMF-backed tax reforms across various regions, the report highlights the disconnect between the IMF’s policy prescriptions and the socio-economic realities of developing countries. The study underscores the need for reforming the international debt architecture to address the negative impacts of these policies and proposes recommendations for more equitable and sustainable debt and tax solutions.

Sovereign Debt News Update No. 132: Examining Kenya’s Attempts at Regaining Fiscal Momentum

In conclusion, the government's multifaceted approach to addressing its economic challenges and debt burden is evident in both its fiscal and non-fiscal strategies. While the implemented fiscal measures represent attempts to manage the debt crisis, the focus on governance and anti-corruption, exemplified by the IMF's comprehensive review, signifies a recognition of the underlying systemic issues. This review, mirroring similar assessments conducted in countries like Benin, where the IMF engaged in a detailed governance diagnostic mission from June to September 2022, is crucial. The success of this initiative, however, hinges on the government's genuine commitment to implementing the necessary reforms to enhance efficiency and accountability.

Some Reflections on Recent Developments on Double Standards and Selectivity in International Criminal Law

Discrepancies between the aspiration to apply ICL indiscriminately and the reality of its application described above drive perceptions of double standards. In this blog post, I will sketch the origins and context that led to double standards in ICL and consider how to differentiate double standards from selectivity and whataboutism. I will argue that recent developments illustrate double standards within the ICL framework. Given that the legitimacy of international criminal justice crucially depends on its impartial application, it remains paramount to work towards unmasking and remedying such double standards in ICL.

Call for Abstracts: Energising Sustainable Development: A Review of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7

We invite abstract submissions for an interdisciplinary workshop on Energising Sustainable Development: A Review of SDG 7, supported by the Society of Legal Scholars’ Small Projects and Events Fund.

Afronomicslaw Sovereign Debt Quarterly Brief, No. 1 of 2025: The Limits of Carbon Markets as a Solution to the Climate Crisis

In this quarterly report, I argue that the climate crisis has provided theglobal finance industry an opportunity to make exorbitant profits frommajority Black and Brown countries in the Global South. I show how theglobal finance industry is leveraging its muscle over climate-vulnerable andheavily indebted countries in the Global South through complex financialtransactions.

Invitation - Afronomicslaw Quarterly Report Launch: The Limits of Carbon Markets as a Solution to the Climate Crisis

Join us for the launch of Afronomicslaw’s latest quarterly report, "The Limits of Carbon Markets as a Solution to the Climate Crisis" by James Thuo Gathii. This report critically examines the role of global finance in commodifying biodiversity assets and its implications for climate justice and sovereign debt in the Global South. The session will include an author presentation and a Q&A session.

Speaking out in China Against the Russian Aggression in Ukraine and speaking out in the Netherlands Against the Atrocities in Gaza

This blog post describes anecdotal and individual experiences. In future research I shall try to situate the experiences described below in the raging debate on whether or not academic institutions need to express solidarity - and act on it through boycotts, sanctions, etc. - in response to atrocities being committed anywhere in the world, a debate which is taking place on university campuses all over the world. This phenomenon deserves wider study, not only by international lawyers but also from various (multi)disciplinary perspectives. This blog post relates to ways in which academic institutions talk about and respond to alleged breaches of international law rather than double standards in international law as such.