Afreximbank

This paper examines the contested claim that the African Export-Import Bank (Afreximbank) enjoys Preferred Creditor Status (PCS), particularly in the context of its recent downgrade by Fitch to BBB-. While Afreximbank cites provisions in its founding treaty as evidence of such status, the realities of sovereign debt restructuring suggest that PCS is not a legally enforceable right, but a practice shaped by consistent behaviour and market consensus. The analysis argues that, despite normative justifications advanced by African multilateral development banks and sympathetic scholars, the inconsistent treatment of Afreximbank’s claims by African sovereigns has weakened its path toward recognition. Drawing on recent debt workouts in Ghana and Zambia, the paper highlights how systemic pressures and the absence of a global debt resolution framework have compelled member states to treat Afreximbank as an ordinary creditor. It concludes that recognition of PCS for regional development banks cannot be achieved solely through legal assertion or treaty clauses. Instead, it must be earned through consistent practice, reinforced by institutional behaviour, and ultimately sponsored by a reformed global financial architecture. In the interim, the creation of a differentiated PCS tier for regional development banks could serve as a pragmatic step toward balancing developmental imperatives with restructuring realities.

The News and Events category publishes the latest News and Events relating to International Economic Law relating to Africa and the Global South. Every week, Afronomicslaw.org receive the News and Events in their e-mail accounts. The News and Events published every week include conferences, major developments in the field of International Economic Law in Africa at the national, sub-regional and regional levels as well as relevant case law. News and Events with a Global South focus are also often included.

South Sudan highlights the precarious position the country finds itself in, both financially and politically. The country is in a serious state of political decomposition due to the protracted conflict, making it difficult to fully engage in the ongoing legal battle with Afreximbank. Undoubtedly, any escalation in the political and security environment could further impede South Sudan’s negotiations with creditors like Afreximbank. With substantial debt obligations and an unstable political environment, South Sudan is at a critical juncture in its post-conflict reconstruction efforts. The Afreximbank case underscores the challenges faced by African nations in managing sovereign debt while balancing economic development with political stability. As South Sudan navigates this complex situation, the international community's role in fostering dialogue, ensuring peaceful resolutions, and supporting sustainable economic policies will be crucial. Whether South Sudan can emerge from this crisis without further destabilizing its fragile governance system will depend largely on its ability to address its debt burdens and maintain peace within its borders.