Human Rights Protection

The Case for Seychelles to Domesticate the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

The Seychelles signed the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities (CRPD), on the 30th of March 2007 and ratified it on the 2nd of October 2009. Since then, the Seychelles has not incorporated the CRPD in its national legislation, for instance as a standalone Act. Although in Seychelles, efforts have been made to introduce policies which are consistent with the CRPD. For instance, the National Strategic Framework for Disability attempts to promote inclusivity and provide support the persons with disabilities and their families through appropriate programmes. However, more needs to be done to ensure the introduction of a Bill before the National Assembly in Seychelles. It is crucial to highlight that the Commonwealth Secretariat’s Human Rights Unit in their assessment report revealed that there has been no attempt to domesticate the CRPD in the Seychelles and there is no distinct or comprehensive legislation on disability, and disability is not dealt with in a systematic way in other legislation in the country.

A Review of the Book-Witness Protection and Criminal Justice in Africa: Nigeria in International Perspective

Witness Protection and Criminal Justice in Africa: Nigeria in International Perspective’, by Dr Suzzie Onyeka Oyakhire, provides an important contribution to the processes aiming to establish witness protection concepts, legislation, and requisite structures for the Nigerian criminal justice system. As Oyakhire points out the challenges in institutionalising witness protection in Nigeria are abundant. For this reason, solid academic research such as her book, will be essential in assisting law makers in drafting a law that on one hand appropriately regulates how witness protection is applied at different stages of proceedings within the specific Nigerian legal, socio-economical, and cultural context and consciously considers what benefit international and national practices and standards could provide to the process on the other. Oyakhire’s caution against applying a ‘one size fits all approach’ and recommendation to be aware of the risk of importing ideas from abroad without due consideration to the national context is highly relevant. This is essential in trying to ensure that whatever system Nigerian authorities decide to implement, it must first and foremost be appropriately adopted to respond to national needs. Some principles for practical implementation of witness protection measures, such as how to mitigate risks through prevention, deterrence, and avoidance, will be similar regardless of the geographical location but finding the appropriate solution to these practical challenges will need to have a local flavour.