Ajibo’s The African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement: Legal and Policy Frameworks offers a comprehensive analysis of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Agreement, its challenges, prospects, and recommendations for future directions. The book equally explores the AfCFTA Agreement’s expected impact on economic growth, regional integration, and legal harmonisation, together with its Protocols, thereby serving as the go-to text for students, researchers, and legal practitioners interested in the ambitious goals of the AfCFTA Agreement. Although other textbooks have been written about the AfCFTA, Ajibo painstakingly adds some twists to this text as he examines the AfCFTA Agreement together with its protocols, such as the Protocols on Trade in Services, Trade in Goods, Investment, Intellectual Property, Rules on Dispute Settlement, and Competition Policy.

Collins C Ajibo’s important book, The African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement: Legal and Policy Frameworks (Routledge, 2024), accomplishes an impressive systematization of the AfCFTA and its protocols, offering critical insights into the policy decisions which inform this international law regime. The AfCFTA is transforming international law, and Ajibo discusses with expertise its most salient innovations, including its extensive interlinkage to sustainable development goals and other regimes, along with concrete proposals for its successful implementation.

The African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement: Legal and Policy Frameworks provides a comprehensive assessment of the African economic integration through the prism and principles of international economic law. The analysis is contextualized within the prevailing regional economic integrations, the WTO and the peculiarity of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). Similarly, legal analysis is bolstered by the political economy of the AfCFTA, illustrating the complex interplay of diverse factors that shape the AfCFTA.

The News and Events category publishes the latest News and Events relating to International Economic Law relating to Africa and the Global South. Every week, Afronomicslaw.org receive the News and Events in their e-mail accounts. The News and Events published every week include conferences, major developments in the field of International Economic Law in Africa at the national, sub-regional and regional levels as well as relevant case law. News and Events with a Global South focus are also often included.

The African Sovereign Debt Justice Network, (AfSDJN), is a coalition of citizens, scholars, civil society actors and church groups committed to exposing the adverse impact of unsustainable levels of African sovereign debt on the lives of ordinary citizens. Convened by Afronomicslaw.org with the support of Open Society for Southern Africa, (OSISA), the AfSDJN's activities are tailored around addressing the threats that sovereign debt poses for economic development, social cohesion and human rights in Africa. It advocates for debt cancellation, rescheduling and restructuring as well as increasing the accountability and responsibility of lenders and African governments about how sovereign debt is procured, spent and repaid. Focusing in particular on Kenya, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Nigeria and Senegal, the AfSDJN will also amplify African voices and decolonize narratives on African sovereign debt . Its activities include producing research outputs to enhance the network’s advocacy interventions. It also seeks to create awareness on and elevate the priority given to sovereign debt and other economic justice issues on the African continent and beyond throughout 2021.

The African Sovereign Debt Justice Network, (AfSDJN), is a coalition of citizens, scholars, civil society actors and church groups committed to exposing the adverse impact of unsustainable levels of African sovereign debt on the lives of ordinary citizens. Convened by Afronomicslaw.org with the support of Open Society for Southern Africa, (OSISA), the AfSDJN's activities are tailored around addressing the threats that sovereign debt poses for economic development, social cohesion and human rights in Africa. It advocates for debt cancellation, rescheduling and restructuring as well as increasing the accountability and responsibility of lenders and African governments about how sovereign debt is procured, spent and repaid. Focusing in particular on Kenya, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Nigeria and Senegal, the AfSDJN will also amplify African voices and decolonize narratives on African sovereign debt . Its activities include producing research outputs to enhance the network’s advocacy interventions. It also seeks to create awareness on and elevate the priority given to sovereign debt and other economic justice issues on the African continent and beyond throughout 2021.

The News and Events category publishes the latest News and Events relating to International Economic Law relating to Africa and the Global South. Every week, Afronomicslaw.org receive the News and Events in their e-mail accounts. The News and Events published every week include conferences, major developments in the field of International Economic Law in Africa at the national, sub-regional and regional levels as well as relevant case law. News and Events with a Global South focus are also often included.

In conclusion, Zambia's journey toward economic recovery, guided in part by its IMF-supported programme, has been marked by both notable achievements and persistent challenges. The "broadly satisfactory" performance and positive forecasts from institutions like Moody's underscore the country's commitment to fiscal and structural reforms, with important milestones already achieved in debt restructuring and economic stabilization. However, the path forward requires unwavering dedication, particularly in addressing persistent issues such as overdue tax revenues and delayed structural reforms. By maintaining fiscal discipline, especially in the lead-up to the 2026 elections, and continuing to implement the ambitious reforms outlined by the IMF, Zambia can strengthen its economic resilience and transform its cautious optimism into tangible, long-term prosperity. The successful finalization of all debt-restructuring agreements in a transparent manner will be the final and critical step in cementing a stable foundation for sustained inclusive growth.

In conclusion, Côte d'Ivoire's recent Samurai bond issuance exemplifies a crucial and growing trend among African governments: the strategic diversification of financing sources to mitigate risks associated with dollar volatility. While this move away from single currency dependence is prudent, it simultaneously underscores an increasing reliance on capital markets for funding. Despite Côte d'Ivoire's commendable fiscal performance, including its successful CFA franc-denominated issuance and a modest Samurai bond coupon, continuous and rigorous monitoring of its sovereign debt fundamentals remains paramount to ensure sustained fiscal health and responsible financing. Further, this trend must be carefully monitored for its potential to continue piling on unsustainable debt for those countries that have embarked on diversifying their creditor base.

In response to these concerns, Ndegwa is demanding comprehensive accountability and transparency from the government. He is requesting detailed information on all secured levies, the specifics of the loans, the identity of the lenders, and how the funds have been utilized. By raising these issues, Ndegwa is not only questioning the legality of the government’s financial maneuvers but also highlighting a broader debate over whether Kenya's current economic state justifies financially risky strategies that could burden future generations. The scenario underscores the critical need for transparent and responsible financial management in the face of the country’s debt management challenges. Hence, by using private entities and failing to fully disclose the terms of these deals, the government appears to have bypassed key constitutional principles of public finance, accountability, and public participation. This approach burdens future generations with long-term debt and undermines effective oversight, raising serious questions about the integrity of the country's debt management practices.